TERRE HAUTE —
NRA’s gun show
goes on and on
There are elephants in the tea room. (Some of the tuskier specimens may even be Boone-and-Crockett caliber.) And no one is taking aim at them. Pray tell, why not? Are they invisible? Are they out of season or simply subjects taboo?
Once again, the National Rifle Association has begun its summer festivities, that is, the herding together of its membership for their traditional march of circular reasoning. (More on that a bit later.) To paraphrase Charlton Heston, former spokesperson for the NRA, “They can have my little pea-shooter when they twist this soda straw from my chilly, tea-stained fingers.”
Nobody wants to take away your pea-shooter. Chuck, you poor, dead, self-aggrandizing, misguided messianic warbler.
As Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president-for-life (and the life beyond) of the NRA, put it following the defeat of a recent effort to ever-so-slightly expand background checks for those wishing to purchase firearms, “This fight will never be over.”
Not even, presumably, after all the combatants are long-since deceased.
I do not see the correlation between concealed-carry laws and the need for a well-regulated militia, but apparently Illinois lawmakers did recently. Perhaps, they were focusing more on political pronouncements than on constitutional proscriptions.
Some will say that the more people who carry guns, the safer we will all be. But when guns are used against other humans to save someone else’s life, it is a one-in-a-million proposition. If a gun is used by one citizen to save another, it makes the news far and wide because it is such a rarity. If, however, a gun is used to murder someone, we rarely hear about it unless there are multiple victims, or it occurs nearby, or if there are freakish or unusual other circumstances surrounding the event.
I am not anti-gun. Furthermore, I support the right to own firearms as outlined in the Second Amendment. I have long believed that the most compelling reason for citizens to have their own weapons is not to defend home and hearth, nor for hunting, nor sport, nor for intimidation of one’s fellow citizens (their most common and exhilarating use today), but because we need to be able to back up our ballot boxes with the actual physical means of removing tyrants, lunatics or conspirators and usurpers of power. The founding fathers acknowledged the importance of this capability (although some of them began to have second thoughts once they realized that they had gained control of the new government and thus stood to be the next ones in line to be overthrown … and these were no nervous Nellies, mind you.)
Times have changed. Today, a small group or even a single person can inflict great harm among the rest of us. The argument is raised that muskets represented cutting-edge technology when the Constitution was adopted. True, but we don’t allow individuals to own tanks, fighter jets, RPGs, landmines, etc., now do we? So, it is established already that there should be limits. The “right to own” is not above logical restrictions.
Ask yourself this: would AR-15s really do the job if it became necessary to upend the government? Have you ever known of a revolution where there was a shortage of small-arms-type weaponry? The arms merchants have long tentacles, and they are always ready to turn a profit.
What’s more, their consciences are small enough, spit-wad-sized, to slip easily through the muzzle of a soda straw.
The hallelujah chorus of the NRA’s declaration of positions is that the only way to stop the use of guns in mass killings is to prevent criminals and people with mental problems from acquiring guns. Yet the same remain steadfastly opposed even to minimalist expansion of background checks. This is logic marching in a circle. How can those with mental problems or criminals be identified without checking into the background of would-be purchasers? That’s just crazy talk. (Friendly little game of Catch-22 anyone?)
Yet, for the benefit of M’sieurs Kite and LaPierre, the show must go on. Let’s get these ducks in a row.
All together now, tail-to-trunk-to-tail-to-trunk, once more around the Big Top!
— Clay Wilkinson
TERRE HAUTE —
NRA’s gun show
- Readers’ Forum: July 30, 2014
Readers’ Forum: July 29, 2014
• Anything goes with the liberals
• Deserter does not deserve discharge
• Outrage lacking on IRS scandal
Readers’ Forum: July 28, 2014
• Tea party folks misunderstood
• We have only us to blame
- Readers' Forum: July 27, 2014
Flashpoint: Why incumbents keep getting re-elected
Nearly three-quarters of Americans want to throw out most members of Congress, including their own representative, yet the vast majority of incumbents will be returning to Capitol Hill in January.
Flashpoint: Spreading the good word about marriage equality
If you blinked over the past month, you probably missed some news about marriage equality in Indiana.
- Readers’ Forum: July 25, 2014
Readers’ Forum: July 24, 2014
• Clinic will expand basic health access
• Misunderstanding truth about Islam
- Readers’ Forum: July 23, 2014
Readers’ forum: July 22, 2014
• Supt. Ritz has right to govern
• A tribute to a teacher
• Rep. Pelosi shows ‘bungling idiocy’
Readers’ forum: July 20, 2014
• ‘Hotel Indiana’ has a sour tune
• Kind words about the newspaper
• Some questions about RTL video
• No mercy for cop killers
• Crack down on gun violence
• Anti-Dem tirades mask GOP failures
• Important day for participants
• Appreciation for support
FLASHPOINT: Solve our border crisis
More than 60,000 unaccompanied alien children — mostly from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador — have been apprehended on America’s southern border during this fiscal year.
Flashpoint: Will Gov. Pence be true to his word?
This is written in response to recent remarks made by State Board of Education members.
- Readers’ Forum: July 18, 2014
READERS’ FORUM: July 17, 2014
• Civil rights and burning cities
• Quality service from Baesler’s
FLAHSPOINT: Supt. Glenda Ritz ‘creating conflict’
It has been my pleasure for the past year to serve as the newest member of the Indiana State Board of Education. I bring a fresh perspective to the board as an attorney and business executive who served as Director of Economic Development under former Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson and President of the Indy Partnership, a regional economic development organization charged with recruiting new companies to our state.
Readers’ Forum: July 16, 2014
• The truth about property taxes
Readers’ Forum: July 15, 2014
• Are Fed policies hurting America?
• Staying true to code of respect
Readers’ Forum: July 14, 2014
• Where did the 61 cents go?
Readers’ Forum: July 13, 2014
• Telling the truth about smoking
• Larger energy bills on the way, thanks to EPA
• Embrace the compassion, not self-righteousness
• Wondering about country’s leaders
• New amendments have hurt country
- Readers’ Forum: July 11, 2014
READERS' FORUM: July 10, 2014
• Herb Faire a great success
• Appreciation for a ‘lovely angel’
• Thanks for stirring fireworks show
Readers’ Forum: July 9, 2014
• Don’t eliminate our six-day mail
• Zamperini death stirs memories
Readers’ Forum: July 8, 2014
• T-S ignores common decency
• Lighten up on Donald Sterling
• Time to reject Dems in Congress
• Fueling the EPA
Readers’ Forum: July 7, 2014
• The moral issue is major issue
Readers’ Forum: July 6, 2014
• Coats ignoring climate science
• Do those mustache posters exist?
• Utility rate freeze took determination
• What perversion is next in line?
• Opinions vary, but voters will decide
• This preaching must stop — now
• Golf fundraiser a huge success
- Readers’ Forum: July 4, 2014
Readers’ Forum: July 3, 2014
• Over the top on immigration
- Readers’ Forum: July 2, 2014
Readers’ Forum: July 1, 2014
• Defying the laws of God
• Correcting the written record
• Hands of $$ from Redevelopment
• Celebrity visit for celebration
- More Letters Headlines